Thursday, December 14, 2006

Learn from History!!

Those who fail to learn from History, are sure to repeat the same mistakes
We all know that Prithwiraj Singh Chauhan had defeated Mohammad Ghori, not once but seventeen times and then let go, often times with a lot of gold and jewelry, as present. And every time, the bastard came back, with more and more ruffians. The reason was simple. They were told by Ghori, that they could not lose in any case. He told the skeptic looters: "Look, I lost in battle but I still had all these presents from the kafir king. And believe you me, if I had won I would have brought back with me ten times the gold, silver and jewelry from the land of the heathens." And as a result, Ghori collected more and more volunteers to boost his forces. That has essentially been the history of India, throughout the ages and our leaders never learnt a lesson. And it was the common folks who bore the brunt of the attack. It was their wives and daughters who were kidnapped and sold in the slave markets of Persia, Arabia, Iraq and so on, after the final battle had been lost to the Mohammedans.
And we have also seen recently how V.P. Singh, a wretched descendant of Jaichand, telephoned all the way from England to Seif-ud-din (sword of Islam) Soz of Kashmir to go against his party's whip to undo what both Singh and Soz wrongly considered a communal party. The gene of the traitor cannot be cured but should be recognized prior to any harm is done.
One is tempted to ask: 'What kind of leaders did we have? Are they of the same kind even today? Did our leaders learn a thing or two from past experiences, past mistakes?'
In this short article, we will attempt to cast a few looks at our past leaders, 'past' because after having failed the nation miserably, they are no more, while the misled countrymen still refuse to look at their follies and go on building minarets in their honor. The idea is of course to keep the myth alive, the myth of presenting traitors and thieves as great and self-sacrificing patriots. No one tells us how can a traitor become a patriot? How could the people be so easily fooled and so often, time after time? Only because we, the people, failed to cast a good look ourselves at these men and women bent upon fooling us. They were past masters in the art of 'ruling by fooling' and naturally our simple people, along with the not-so-simple people, got fooled and for centuries paid the price of servitude!
In the matter of uncovering the truth, the only real problem could be to get to the truth. The leaders, the Gandhis, the Nehrus have so cleverly covered up their foot-prints, that it is not always easy to get to the truth. No doubt, some of the facts related in these pages will appear to have been prompted by hatred and therefore are untrue and malicious. The reader may be assured that such is NOT the case. All the facts related herein can be examined independently by each reader to determine the ultimate truth. Although it is not quite possible to cite ALL the sordid details concerning every leader, enough is cited to inspire trust in the findings. Of course, there are many more such cases which still need to be divulged and we request our countrymen to come forward to lend a hand in this task of truth-finding, for the good of our long-suffering land!
The Nehrus: Mughalon ki Aulad (The offspring of the Mughals)Guru Gobind Singh was murdered by two Pathans at his hideaway at Nanded, in the year of 1708 A.D. In 1716 A.D., a character-less Moghul prince named Farrukhsiar, invited Raj Kaul, the ancestor of the present-day Nehrus (they used to be called Kauls at the time) to live in Delhi and awarded him with a plot of land near the capital city. Ths piece of land had a small nullah or nahr (Persian for nullah) in it and Raj Kaul's children altered their name to Kaul-Nehru, a much respected double-barreled name. Eventually, the 'Kaul' part, like the tail of a tadpole, disappeared and only 'Nehru' remained. Ganga Dhar's son Motilal was a Kashmiri Brahmin in name only. He was Islamized to the core. In stead of calling himself Motilal Dhar like his father Ganga Dhar, he changed his name to Motilal Nehru. He named his son Jawaharlal Nehru. His Kashmiri Hindu origin was thus obliterated although oftentimes the connection with Kashmir and its Brahminical roots were flaunted to falsely impress upon the gullible Hindus.
The legacy of this incident went far, very far. The antipathy of the Nehrus for the Sikhs started at that time and persisted till today when Indira Gandhi practicaly ostracized Menaka (they call her Maneka now, because Menaka is a Hindu apsara; how stupid can one be?) Gandhi, even after her wedding with Sanjay (aka Sanjiv). It is this anti-Sikh sentiment that had provoked the dastardly crime committed in the holy Harimandir Sahib Temple at Amritsar on a Gurpurab Day when the temple premises were full of women and children gathered together for the festivites. It was then Indira, the Mohammedan wife of Feroze Khan, ordered to shoot. And we have the gall to castigate General O'Dyer only? O'Dyer was snuffed out by Udham Singh in his hometown, London. Was there ever any doubt that Indira would be spared?
What was the reason for the award of the landed property to the Kauls? It is said that Raj Kaul and his people betrayed Guru Gobind Singh; they informed the Mughals of the place where the tenth Guru was resting. He was then at Nanded and this location was reported to the Moghuls by Raj Kaul, the ancestor of the Kauls, soon-to-be Nehrus. Two Pathans were sent for the specific purpose of murdering Guru Gobind Singh (almost like Abdul Rashid's slaughter of Swami Shraddhanand). And once the Guru was no more, Farrukhsiar awarded Raj Kaul with that piece of land.
The Nehru family has always been presented to the Hindus of India as staunch Kashmiri Brahmins. The only ones that were indeed Kashmiris, were their women folk, such as Kamala Nehru (nee Kaul) wife of Jawahar, or Thussu (aka Swarup Rani) wife of Motilal. Neither Jawahar, nor Motilal was born or reared in Kashmir. The same was true for Nan (aka Vijay Lakshmi) or Krishna, the two sisters of Jawaharlal. One found pictures in specially bound books showing a wooden cot with a head-table carrying a book. The cot was supposed to be where the young Jawahar used to sleep. The title of the book was illegible but the legend at the bottom of the picture said that it was a copy of the Bhagavadgita. As if, the little Jawahar used to read the Bhagavadgita! Now remember, after his birth in father Motilal's house at the Cheoki area of the Mirganj section (a notorious red-light area) of Allahabad and his prompt removal to the palace of the Nawab of Oudh for upbringing, where he completed his first years of education (mostly in Persian and Urdu and not Hindi or Sanskrit), little Jawahar had left for England. There were instances when at the dinner table, dad Motilal (well-versed in Urdu and Persian) used to recite small Persian couplets and ask little Jawahar to give the meanings of the verses and most often Jawahar could not satisfy his father. His knowledge of Hindi and Sanskrit was nil while his command over Persian was mediocre at best. He had a good command over the Urdu language though. Josh Malihabadi has written a few lines about Nehru's proficiency in Urdu in his nearly 800 page long book titled Yaadon ki Baraat.
The whole family was saturated with love, respect and servile feeling for whatever was Islamic. Jawahar himself jumped at the opportunity to go to Kabul, when the Soviets once invited him for a social visit. At Kabul, he visited the burial place of Babur, although the Afghans themselves did not show much regard for the old invader (who would eventually destroy the Ram Mandir at Ayodhya). In his autobiography, Jawahar is eloquent on the perfection of the mosque at Samarkand built under Babur. Well, he did not know, neither any one told him, that the mosque at Samarkand were in fact built by Indian masons and artisans who had been carried away to Afghanistan by force along with thousands of our women, horses, cattle and of course gold and silver.
Later, much later, daughter Indira Priyadarshini would visit the same grave of Babur with a great deal of admiration. Indira made a state visit to Afghanistan in 1969. Now let me quote from K. Natwar Singh's book titled Profiles & Letters, page 167:
"...On the third day, she had an hour free. 'Let us go for a drive', she said to me. This was immediately arranged. In a few minutes we were outside the city limits of Kabul. Her eyes caught a patch of green on the hill to the left of the road. We were told it was the resting place of Babur (1483-1530 A.D.). Mrs Gandhi's respect for history transcended her adherence to protocol. She expressed her desire to see the spot. The Afghans were most agitated - no security, no one to receive and show the PM around! She would have none of it. So up the hill we went. What at one time must have been an attractive garden-cum-graveyard, was now semi-jungle. Obvioulsy Babur did not mean much to our Afghan friends. It took us a while to locate the great man's grave. The Prime Minister of India stood there, with head slightly bowed, paying her homage. I was a couple of feet behind her. It was a moment to cherish, recall and remember. At that moment the centuries seemed to blend and blur.
"After a minute she stepped back and said, 'We have had our brush with history'. I said, 'I have had two'. 'What do you mean?' 'To pay one's respects to Babur was itself an occasion,' I said, 'but to to do so in the company of Indira Gandhi was the rarest of privileges'." (Now this is called 'true buttering of the boss' and Natwar Singh's job was secured permanently.)
After nikaah comes talaaqIndira married the son of a Sunni liquor merchant of Allahabad patronized by Motilal. The liquor merchant's name was Nawab Khan and his son's name was Feroze. Thus Feroze was the son of a Sunni Mohammedan but to the Indian public he was sold as a Parsi. His mother used to be a Parsi woman BEFORE her nikah with Nawab Khan. And she had to change her Parsi faith prior to the nikah and therefore it was untrue to say that Feroze's mother was a Parsi. She was a Musalmanani when Feroze was born. No one calls Seif Ali (sword of Ali), son of Pataudi a Hindu just because his mother Aisha Sultana used to be a Brahmin woman named Sharmila Tagore prior to her nikah with Pataudi. She too had changed her faith from Hinduism to Islam just prior to nikah. It is this kind of play with words, almost like the sleight of hand of a magician, that keeps our people misinformed.
Writes M.O. Mathai, a Kerala Christian who had been Nehru's personal assistant for decades, in his book titled Reminiscences of the Nehru Era, on page 94: "For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage. So, strictly under the law, Indira was only a 'concubine' and her children are 'bastards'."
But that was not the end of the story, not yet. Like most Mohammedans, Feroze too had a pair of 'roving eyes'. Writes M.O. Mathai on pages 94-95: "In 1947 Feroze Gandhi fell in love with one of Mrs. Pandit's daughters working as an apprentice journalist in the National Herald at Lucknow. On hearing this, Mrs. Pandit made an air-dash to India from Moscow (she was India's ambassador in Moscow then) at her own expense and took away the girl to Moscow."
So Feroze, with obviously a strong polygamous propensity, fell for another girl. Writes M.O. Mathai: "This time it was the daughter of a Muslim minister of the UP government. The girl was working in the All India Radio in New Delhi. They decided to marry. Feroze Gandhi spoke to Indira about his intention. She told him that she had no objection. (In fact, among the Muslims, even Indian Muslims, in spite of the so called Vedic marriage, polygamy is the custom). He also said that he wanted the custody of the first child (Rajiv). But this time she firmly refused to consider this." It all goes to show that the Vedic marriage was a ploy to fool the Hindu public. The real marriage had taken place (behind the back of all and sundry) in a London mosque, Indira had changed to the Islamic faith to nikah Feroze but did not want the people of India to know the facts.
Indira's knowledge of the niceties of Islam was mediocre. When she became the prime minister, she hired, not one but three Mohammedan clergymen to help her with advices on Islamic matters. Why three? One was a Sunni advisor, the other two were Shia and Ahmediya. Mind you, there were no Hindu Pandits to guide her. Was she so well versed in Hindu ways herself by virtue of a fictitious Kashmiri Brahmin legacy? Neither were there any Sikh, Parsi or Christian (Catholic and Protestant) advisors. The Islamic orientation has always been there; if the people were unaware of it that was because it was done under cover. Such propensity to fool own people has been the primary reason for India's gradual fall, as we will show later.
Javed/Shabana InterludeThe Islamic practice has recently been well advertized by the conduct of Javed Akhtar (Shabana's current husband). Javed had married Honey Irani from a very reputable Parsi family. In fact, Honey Irani is the sister of the well-known Daisy Irani. Honey Irani married well below her station. After all Javed Akhtar was an ordinary lyric writer in Bollywood loaded with rough characters and whores. They had two children with Arabic names: Farhan (a boy) and Joya (a girl). As soon as Javed fell in love with Shabana while producing the one-woman drama titled Tumhari Amrita in which Javed and Shabana had their fill in insulting the Hindu public, Javed had the gall to talaaq Honey and in accordance with the Islamic custom, kept custody of the two children. The matter had hit the head-lines. In the play Tumhari Amrita, Shabana played the part of a character-less Hindu woman addicted to drinking and many other vices praying and pleading to a married Mohammedan man to have sex with her and marry her. And the play ran with full houses for months with Hindu audience! Is this how we are going to look after the Common Civil Code? The actual scenario is much worse and was further blurred by no less a person than the so called master of Hindi poetry, Vajpayee himself. He took both Shabana and her lover-boy Javed to Lahore to meet Mohammed Nawaz Sharif, by bus. Isn't that a shame? Is this how Vajpayee proposes to boost his support for the 'Common Civil Code'?
The Father of the NationLet us change the subject for a while and speak of the Father of the Nation, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi of Kathiawad. Apparently, India was an orphan land for the last thousands of years, prior to Gandhi's taking charge. He had four sons and the eldest was Haridas. He was so disgusted with his own dad that he took to drinking and whoring. Most of the time he could be found in Heeramandi, the notorious brothel area of Lahore. Mother Kasturba was very dejected. She wrote him a letter requesting him to come back to Hinduism for in the mean time he had become a Mohammedan. And she wrote the letter in her own blood. That made the youngman come back to the ancestral fold and all this time the old crow did not bat an eye. 'Old crow' because he had not said 'Hey Raam' at the time Nathuram shot him dead. In fact, he did not say anything but a long 'phoose' before collapsing like a bag of potatoes. And the crooks of the Congress Party made a million dollar movie out of it depicting Gandhi crying out 'Raam'.
In addition to the four sons, Gandhi also had a daughter. No one speaks of her. Why? The only plausible reason is her arranged marriage with a Muslim boy. That was unnatural for a man like Gandhi but such are the facts of life, often stranger than fiction.
Gandhi: the first member of the Muslim LeagueIt all happened in London in 1889. That year, the Muslim students of London started the Anjuman Islamia, which used to meet every Sunday at the residence of its members. Although its members were all Muslims, its debates were open to the participation of non-Muslims as well. Some of its members, in later life rose to distinguished positions in India's public life. Thus we had men like: Sir Ali Imam, Hasan Imam, Mozharul Huq, all barristers of Bihar, Sir Abdur Rahim of Bengal, Sir Muhammad Shafi of Punjab, all studying Law at the Middle Temple. There were only two Hindu members of the Anjuman: M.K. Gandhi and Harkishan Lal of Lahore, who later founded the Punjab National Bank. The Muslim members belonged to the school of thought that gradually developed into the Muslim League. Jinnah arrived after Gandhi had left in 1891 and then Jinnah took over the newly named Muslim League. Until then, it was M.K. Gandhi who had been the number one member of the Muslim League alias Anjuman Islamia. But this fact has been kept under the lid for so many years. Only now, many such facts are coming out in driblets.
Risky GamesOne of the main reasons is of course the practice of our leaders to keep our common people uninformed. Oftentimes, even the learned and educated are also kept in the dark. Let us cite a few concrete cases.
Zakir's ShenanigansZakir Husain had written, clandestinely of course, to Mohammed Ali Jinnah of Pakistan, begging for a job under him. He wrote the letter in June 1947, prior to the formation of Pakistan. For whatever reason, Jinnah did not hire him although he had indeed hired a host of Muslim men suggested by Zakir. Nehru knew of this situation at the time. In spite of this knowledge, he hired the traitor as India's Vice President and then Nehru died. His daughter, again, knowingly or unknowingly, hired the traitor as India's first Muslim president. Does anyone realize what kind of risk our country went through during Zakir's tenure? Later, much later, after the death of Zakir, his hand-written letter to Jinnah was discovered by Pakistanis and they published its contents in the Daily Dawn. All of Pakistan knew of this incident but not the Hindus of India. The Congress government summarily refused to give publicity to this very important item of news. It was later publicised in the free Press Journal of Bombay when an Indian individual sent it to the editor for dissemination to our people.
Then take the case of Fakhruddin, the second Mohammedan president of India. He is the one that had signed the papers permitting Indira Gandhi to clamp down her Emergency Rules, putting the entire country in prison.
Salman HaidarWe had also the case of Salman Haider, who was, in the name of secularism, permitted to reach the highest post in his department, solely by seniority. Then something happened. Vajpayee was in charge and Salman Haider was fired by Vajpayee. Why, for what reason, the people of India were never told. Neither was brought to light the fact that his son, Nadeem Haider, had married Dr. Subramaniam Swamy's daughter. This was an arranged marriage that called for changing his daughter's religion to Islam. Remember, Subramnaim Swamy is a Brahmin from Tamilnadu. But unfortunately, our own people do not know the fact of this inter-faith wedding nor the real reason why daddy Salman Haider was let go most unceremoniously. No one seems to know the adage "Ignorance is weakness and self-inflicted ignorance is suicide". And our leaders promote such ignorance, right left and center, to add to the increased weakness of our people.
Name ChangersThere is another breed of traitors, those who change names and pass themselves off as patriots. Indrajit Gupta, the communist member of Lok Sabha is one. He changed his faith and became a Mohammedan in order to nikah a talaaqed woman named Suraiyya, who used to be the married wife of one Dr. Ahmed. Indrajit Gupta became Imtiaz Ghani, after change of faith. They got nikahed at Bogra, a small town in West Bangladesh. Can one imagine that this man was made the Home Minister of India and no one knew that we had a Mohammedan at that post. It is commonly known that a recently made Mohammedan is more treasonous to what he considers as a kafir country. Similar was the case with Mohd. Sayeed who too had been hired as the Home Minister of India only to release the Kashmiri militants.
Now we have got a hot potato on our hands in the form of the converted Catholic president Kocheril Raman Naraynan. He carries a Hindu name to fool the public. His body language is threatening. The game is not yet over but our reading says that it is not going to be too palatable to India's public. What common people do not know is that Kocheril is a Catholic fundamentalist, anti-Brahmin to the core and anti-Hindu in his dealings. His Burmese-born wife Tin Tin (the word means 'distinguished' which she changed to Sanskrit word 'Usha' to fool the people) is a well-known evangelist like the wife of P.C. Alexander. When Narayanan was the Indian ambassador in Washington, he had regular visits by Catholic missionaries and it is not by chance that the recent confrontation with the padris took place at this time.
Mohammed YunusMohammad Yunus, unbeknown to many, sired Sajay (or Sanjiv). He lived with the Nehru family at their home. He is married, has a genuine Mohammedan wife, mother of Adil Shahriyar, a playmate of the two Gandhi brothers, Rajiv and Sanjiv or Sanjay. Nehru, while alive had handed him the duty to look after the Netaji Papers, for the simple reason that Nehru did not want the contents of the Netaji papers to be divulged to the Indian people. Now that he is dead, the netaji papers should really be sent to the National Archives in Delhi. Yunus is still sitting on the Netaji papers while in the mean time, his felon son, Adil Shahriyar (he was awarded a 35-year sentence) is now dead and gone. The question still remains when will the indian public have a first look at the Netaji Papers?
Krishna MenonHere is a cad that was put in charge of India's Defense Ministry by no less a personality than the one and only Jawahar. The first thing this China-loving man did was shut down the Ichapur gun Factory of West Bengal. 'No guns should be made there, from now on.' he roared and transformed the machinery to manufacture coffee-making gadgets.
Then China attacked India. He did not know which way to turn. His worst moment came when a South American pretty lady charged him on a paternity suit in London. He had rendered her pregnant, the charge said. Krishna Menon did not know what to do. Eventually, he went to a doctor who wrote a certificate that Menon was impotent and ergo could not have impregnated the pretty lady. He had to pay a hefty fine though and the GoI chipped in to pay the fine. It was the first time India realized that we had a Defense Minister who was impotent! When is India going to start systematic physical examination of leaders at the top, like in all civilized countries? On his first day as Indian High Commissioner in London, this patriotic man ordered, not one but two brand new Rolls Royce cars for his own use. Do our people know such activities by our other patriots? And Rajiv Gandhi had once wanted to build a statue of Menon in the South, which project was fortunately abandoned.
The Two BoysRajiv and Sanjiv (or Sanjay) grew up under the care of their mother although the fathers were two different men: Feroze Gandhi and Mohammad Yunus. Both the boys were aware of their parentage but tried to pass themselves off as Parsis. However, at home, at one time, they used to grow beard, the kind of beard which even the Talibans would approve of. It can be called truly Islamic beard but one does not come across such pictures showing Rajiv and Sanjay for obvious reasons. We display one such picture for your attention. It was taken from the Nehru Museum and thus cannot be a fake!
Let us be thankful to our Gods, they have been saving us till nowDear Readers! Please keep faith in our gods. As long as our common people (by this we mean not the Nehrus, not the Gandhis but the Gaya Rams and Aya Rams of small towns and villages) have faith in them, our holy land is going to be saved. But for heaven's sake let us not make their task too difficult.In a land where even a chicken is not hurt unnecessarily, we had, not one, not two but three full fledged assassinations in quick succession. And surprise of surprises, they were all Gandhis, an unusual name. One was shot by a Hindu, the second was slaughtered by two Sikhs and the third was pulverized by a Catholic lady of Tamil extraction. And the second son, who had once boasted that after having won the next election, he would clamp down an Emergency Rule, lasting for twenty long years, kicked the bucket in his own plane. The car-thief didn't even see his end coming. And the man who made us all his nephews and nieces, without even seeking our permission, died of syphilis, like Gandhi's son Haridas and Lenin the communist. If this is not a divine dispensation, then pray what is?